Japanese Government Tax Madness

The foolishness of the government of Japan officials never ceases to amaze me. We have had a budgetary problem and debt problem in this country for over twenty years. Our debt is over 200% of GDP. The government's answer to this problem is never to cut government expenditures, but to always raise taxes. When will these people ever learn?


N-E-V-E-R!

Paaaaarty!

Incredibly, officials of the current Japanese government of Naoto Kan have once again  proclaimed that instead of cutting the budget and government expenditures, Japan needs to increase revenues by increasing Sales Tax by more than 200%. Are these people insane? They have even said this in public!


Are they intentionally trying to get booted out from office? I mean, to think about raising taxes is one thing, but to say that in public!? Where are the nice men in white suits when you need them?


Hakuo Yanagisawa, who was just appointed to a government panel on social welfare, says that a "10% Sales Tax is not enough" and that those taxes must be increased by more than 200% from its current 5%.


Madness. What a looney!


Yanagisawa must be totally and completely out of touch with the lives of the people he is supposed to be serving. The question that needs to be asked is if he is crazier than the guy who just appointed him, Naoto Kan?

Writer's rendition of Japanese Prime Minister Naoto Kan

The economy is stagnate, interest rates are near zero, people's savings have dried up all the while Japan has a huge problem with a large percentage of society reaching retirement age. On top of that, Japan's debt rating was just lowered.


With all this bad news, these government wonks think that the solutions to our problems lie in increasing taxes!? These people are completely nuts.


The Japan Times reports:


The consumption tax needs to be more than doubled to shore up the government's finances, given soaring debt and welfare costs, according to a member of Prime Minister Naoto Kan's tax and social security panel. "I don't think an increase to 10 percent is enough," former financial services minister Hakuo Yanagisawa said Tuesday in an interview at his Tokyo office. "Our discussions must be based on new realities."


I wrote before that the government of this country will never recognize a crisis until it is too late. They will never understand that raising taxes and raising taxes has been tried in the past, yet our debt bomb continues to grow. Once again, I'd like to reiterate that I predict that the government of Naoto Kan will be booted from office this June.


Japan Times continues:

Raising the tax may have political consequences. The Democratic Party of Japan did poorly in the Upper House election last July after Kan floated the idea of raising the levy. When the tax was last raised in 1997, the economy went into recession.

Duh! Do you think it's going to happen again?

The Japan Times article starts to defy belief when they say that, according to a survey, that 60 percent of voters believe that taxes must be raised. If you believe that, I have a portable ramen stall that's sitting in front of the train station to sell you. 

More than 60 percent of voters believe raising the tax is necessary while 35 percent disagree, according to a Yomiuri Shimbun survey published Jan. 16. The paper polled 1,069 people on Jan. 14 and 15 and didn't provide a margin of error.

There's no way I can believe that Joe Japanese guy on the street would ever say that he is not taxed enough already. If those survey results were true, if 60% of the public believe that taxes must be raised, then why did Kan's party fare so poorly in the last election?

Just let them try to raise the taxes and see just how badly they get trounced in the next elections.

By the mere virtue of saying in public that taxes must be raised by more than 200% and then adding that these discussions about taxes, "....must be based on new realities" just shows how far out of touch with the regular people, er, I mean, us peasants, these government fools are. I wonder how much longer Joe Japanese is going to put up with this?


When the problem is government debt, why can't they ever come up with ways of cutting spending - like eliminating military exercises (that must surely be against Article 9 of the Japanese Constitution? Why must it always be increasing taxes? 


These people have to go.... I need to have a drink.

Win a Vacation to Croatia with Domino Pizza Starting Today!!!

Domino Pizza does it again!

VISIT CROATIA FOR FREE!

Once again, Domino Pizza has a great campaign starting today! How do they keep coming up with these great campaigns?

Two lucky people will win a vacation to Croatia on Austrian Airlines courtesy of Domino Pizza, Croatia Tourism, Japan Travel Bureau, and Austrian Airlines. The contest begins today!!!

From today, Feb. 3, 2011 until Feb. 17, 2011, if you go to Domino Pizza website and become an e-mail  member, you get the chance to win a vacation to Croatia! There is no purchase necessary!

Domino Pizza English site is here: http://www.dominos.jp/eng/

日本語：http://www.dominos.jp/

It's all a part of the Domino Pizza "Heartful" campaign for Valentine's Day 2011! You can order a heart-shaped Domino Pizza between Feb. 10, 2011 until Feb. 14, 2011  and have it sent to that special person (if you order online, you get a 5% discount too!) And, you get a chance to win a vacation for two for 4 nights and 6 days in heartful Croatia!

What a fantastic promotion! I'm going to order one for my wife! Do you think she'll get mad if my son and I eat it all?

Fly in style with Austrian Airlines

200 people will also win Croatia Hearts and Lavender

This campaign is supported by

 

Austrian Airlines

JTB

Croatia National Tourism 

Domino Pizza

To Comment or Not To Comment? That is the Question

Just a short article today about my thoughts on allowing comments to your blog.


There are several news and information sites about Japan that have a comments section that is full of, well, what I consider foolish and often rude comments from frustrated readers. I think these sites do a great service for us English speakers and I wish they would quit being so amateurish and "up" their game and get to world class.


Compare say, News On Japan (what I consider to be the best English news site for Japan) to, say, what I think is Singapore's best English news site, the Straits Times. 


There is no comparison to style and flair. There is also no comparison to the quality level of sponsors. 


All three of the "big" English news for Japan sites are this way. I know most Japanese do not understand the importance of image and branding, but you'd think the foreigners would...


There was a time a few years ago when the guy who owned one of these sites asked me if I would run it for him. He also asked, if I ran his site, how I would reform it in order to get more and better paying sponsors?

Insults are OK in a public forum if they funny and are not 

personal nor directed at a certain individual

I had lots of ideas, but the first was that I told him to reform or get rid of the comments section.


He wouldn't even consider it. He said that he needed the comments section in order to get readers to come to his site. Well, it's his site, he can do as he wishes, but I think he is completely wrong and short sighted. Here's why:


Think about a blog or a news site as an experience for visitors. Do you think people enjoy going to Internet sites and see/reading negative or insulting remarks? (A blog can be different as it should appeal to a focused group). 


I think it is a special group of people who do enjoy getting frustrated and writing vitriol to blow off their stress. They have earned the special moniker of "troll." I think people who are busy, enjoy life, and have discretionary income generally do not hand out invective at the readers comments sections; they do not earn the title of troll. The people who do take the time to add value are appreciated, the ones who hurl invective - the trolls - are probably very frustrated people.


But this is conjecture on my part.


I especially don't think potential sponsors want to be associated with anything that could be construed as insulting to people and/or a bad or negative experience. I believe that reputable companies who understand branding will not spend their money in places where negativity is promoted.


I sometimes visit sites like Japan Today. I used to visit everyday. But not anymore. The readers comments are quite unsatisfying and sometimes painful. I don't like that part at all.


I do not write this to insult anyone. I write this because I can see where they can better their business. I think the management of sites like that (while being hard-working and good people) are missing the boat if they think great sponsors are going to pay good money to sponsor their site when amateurs and rookies make ill conceived and rude remarks towards Japan and each other. Here's why:


It lessens and cheapens the experience. Great sponsors want to sponsor things other great sponsors support. Who wants to be associated with cat-fights and arguments? 


Think about it.


I do not write this to insult publications like the one I mentioned above, but to help them see their potential.


Let me give you a good example of a company that understands completely what I'm talking about: Have you ever been to an Apple Store? That is usually a good experience for me. It is a good experience for most people, I imagine. The staff are polite, knowledgeable, and friendly. The place is clean and has a good "groove" and atmosphere. Those first three words are important words in building what is a good experience. Let me repeat those words for you again:


Polite
Knowledgeable
Friendly


How do those three words stack up against a reader comment sections whereby some rude people are making nasty remarks and insulting each other in a very disagreeable manner? Granted not everyone is doing this, but does this make for a good and feel-good experience? I do not think so.


I, myself, do get irritated at some people's foolish remarks (I have an article at Lew Rockwell out about that read it here). and I find myself getting irritated, but I try to refrain from writing back some insulting diatribe. Though I do need to be much more diligent in my self-control.


But I do wonder why some people have to write personal invective towards others and use profanity? Gee, hate to sound like a kid, but I don't think that's fun.


Do not get me wrong. I am not saying to eliminate reader's comments. Mish Shedlock allows them. Mish gets over 1.8 million unique users a month. He has a comments section, but his, like this blog's comment section, has to be clicked to be accessed. 


It does not sit open at the end of a news article. The comments are separated. 


Comments can be useful. But make people click through to see them and moderate your comments section. 


I think this is important: A news article is just that; news. Comment's by amateurs is just that; amateur commentary. They should not be one on top of the other...


Like I said, the amateur comments directly below the "real" article cheapens the experience for me. I'll bet it does for most people, it's just that most people haven't thought deeply about why they find the experience distasteful. Here I am putting it into words. 


Anyway, I cannot control what goes on at other Internet sites, but I can control what goes on here at this blog. In my very possibly confused thinking, I'd like for this blog to be a fun and pleasant experience for everyone, so I ask that readers not stop commenting, but please refrain from the personal insults.


If you want to insult others for dumb remarks they make, there's other places that allow you to do so; or, heck, start your own blog.


But this is my blog and, as such, I just want everyone to know that I reserve the right to refuse service to customers as this is a privately owned blog.


I may delete insulting and rude readers comments. I may also delete remarks made by people who write nonsense.


I deleted one the other day when someone took me to task and wrote, "...Japan has one of the most repressive and dictatorial regimes in the world..." Uh, I think this guy was confusing us with North Korea... If his comments were funny, I would have kept them. But they were insulting, so they were deleted.  


Pardon me for being possibly anal retentive but I don't appreciate people - especially people I don't know (named "anonymous") - insulting my guests at my party.


So, I announce that I will probably, from now on delete all insulting and uncivil commentary from this blog's reader's comments. I think that, if you run a blog too, depending on what you are trying to accomplish, you might want to consider doing the same.


No, this blog is never even close to the cool experience of visiting an Apple store, I do not imply that, but I do not want people who do visit the be insulted.


Call me an oldie and/or a prude. I hope you are here to have fun. I am. I will not allow you to be insulted. I've often read, "Do not feed the trolls." OK, I will do my best. To not only not feed the, but to block their admittance.


I think if you run a blog or a news site, you'd be wise to consider this as part of strategic policy.


UPDATE:


This just in from viral marketing guru Seth Godin,


Strategy is worth thinking about if it causes you to make difficult or non-intuitive decisions. And so you have to test your commitment. "Are you saying that we have to cancel this product line?" is the sort of reaction your strategy statements ought to generate.
If you can't put an example on the table, a concrete manifestation of the action being 
discussed, then you're just prattling on, you're not actually serious about strategy.


UPDATE 2:


Tom Boushel adds: "Drink deep, or touch not at all; a little bit of knowledge is a very dangerous thing"